Perspectives & research

Patterns worth following.

A current reading list on AI adoption, workforce change, and how living systems coordinate and adapt. The question is always practical: what changes in the work, and what evidence would show it is helping?

Selected studies

Research behind the practice.

Peer reviewed research and published case evidence on collective leadership, organizational change, and AI adoption. Each summary notes what the study can support and where its evidence is limited.

International Journal of Organizational Analysis · 2026 · Conceptual paper

The Biology of Work: Reframing Organizational Behaviour Through Evolutionary Theory

Shertzer and Nitzan use evolutionary theory to frame cooperation, adaptation, and organizational behavior. This is a conceptual lens rather than an empirical test, so biological parallels are useful prompts for inquiry, not proof that organizations function like organisms.

Read the paper

Acta Psychologica · 2025 · Systematic review

Collective Forms of Leadership and Team Cognition in Work Teams

Gambonnet and colleagues critically review 20 peer reviewed studies on shared leadership and team cognition. The review maps promising links between how leadership is distributed and how teams think together, while noting that the evidence base and measures remain limited.

Read the paper

Management & Marketing · 2026 · Employee and manager survey

Leadership as an Enabler of Organizational Transformation in the Digital and Sustainable Era

Ionică reports survey findings from 420 employees and managers on leadership and organizational transformation. The results offer a useful view of perceived relationships among leadership, digital change, and sustainability, but the cross sectional, nonrandom sample cannot establish cause and effect.

Read the paper

Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2026 · Health system case

From Pilot Trap to Institutional Capacity: A Governance Framework for Sustainable Clinical AI Implementation in Health Systems

Tian and colleagues describe an 18 month clinical AI implementation in a provincial health system and propose a six module governance framework. It offers practical implementation detail, while its single system case does not establish clinical outcome effects across other settings.

Read the paper
← Back to Grensting overview